Digital Training Evaluation – Using the Kirkpatrick Model and Learning Analytics
Ask an L&D professional about how they measure training effectiveness and learning. The likely answer is that they are using the Kirkpatrick 4-level evaluation model. The model has been a staple in the L&D professionals’ toolbox for a long time. However, if you dig deeper, you’ll find that many organisations are only able to assess levels 1 & 2 of the model. While these levels do constitute valuable information, they help very little in determining the true ROI of learning. Luckily, thanks to technological development, we nowadays have the capability to do digital training evaluation on all 4 levels. And here are some best practices on how to do it.
Level 1: Reaction – Use quick feedback and rating tools to monitor engagement
The first level of Kirkpatrick is very easy to implement across all learning activities. You should use digital tools to collect quick feedback on all activities. That can be in the form of likes, star ratings, scoring or likert scales. Three questions should be enough to cover the ground.
- How did you like the training?
- How do you consider the value-add of the training?
- Was the training relevant to your job?
Generally, scale or ratings based feedback is the best for level 1. Verbal feedback requires too much to effectively analyse.
Level 2: Learning – Use digital training evaluation to get multiple data points
For level 2, it all start with the learning objectives. Learning objectives should be very specific, and tied to specific business outcomes (we’ll explain why in level 4). Once you have defined them, it’s relatively easy to build assessment around it. Naturally, we are measuring the increase in knowledge rather than just the knowledge. Therefore, it is vital to record at least 2 data points throughout the learning journey. A handy way to go about this is to design pre-learning and post-learning assessment. The former captures the knowledge and skill level of the employee before starting the training. Comparing that with the latter, we can comfortably identify the increase in knowledge. You can easily do this kind of assessment with interactive quizzes and short tests.
“If you’re measuring only once, it’s almost as good as not measuring at all”
Level 3: Behaviour – Confirm behavioural change through data and analytics
Finally, the level 3 of measuring behaviour is delving into somewhat uncharted territory. There are a couple of different angles for digital training evaluation here.
First, you could engage the learners in self-assessment. For the often highly biased self-assessment, two questions should be enough. If no behavioural change is reported, another question captures the reason behind it, and L&D can intervene accordingly.
- Have you applied the skills learnt? (linking to specific learning, can be a yes/no question)
- If not, why not?
Secondly, since self-assessment is often highly biased, it’s not necessary meaningful to collect more data directly from the learner itself. However, to really get factual insight into level 3, you should be using data and analytics. On the business level, we record a lot of data on a daily basis. Just think about all the information that is collected or fed into the systems we use daily. Thus, you should be using the data from these systems with the self-assessment to get a confirmed insight into the reported behavioural change. For instance, a sales person could see an increase in calls made post training. A marketing person could see an increase in the amount of social media posts they put out. The organisation has all the necessary data already – it’s just a matter of tapping into it.
Level 4: Results – Combining Learning Analytics and Business Analytics
Finally, the level 4 evaluation is the pot of gold for L&D professionals. This is where you link the learning to business performance and demonstrate the ROI through business impact. With modern ways of digital training evaluation you can eliminate the guess work and deliver facts:
To be noted, it is highly important to understand that the evaluation steps are not standalone. Level 4 is linked to levels 2 and 3. If there was no increase in knowledge or behavioural change did not happen, there’s no business impact. You might see a positive change in results, but you should not mistake that as the product of learning if the previous levels have not checked out. But once levels 2 and 3 have come out positive, you can look into the bigger picture.
Firstly, you should look back at the learning objectives, especially the business outcomes they were tied to. If your aim with the sales training was to increase the number of calls made, it’s important to look at what happened in that specific metric. If you see a change, then you can look at the business outcomes. How much additional revenue would those extra sales calls produced? The results can also be changes in production, costs, customer satisfaction, employee engagement etc. In any business, you should be able to assign a dollar value on most if not all of these metrics. Once you have the dollar value, it’s simple math to figure out the ROI.
All in all, there’s really no excuse for not dealing with levels 3 and 4 of Kirkpatrick. You can manage digital training evaluation and learning analytics even with limited budget. It’s just a matter of embracing data and the benefits of data driven decision making.
Want to start evaluating your organisation’s learning on all levels? Click here to start.